1. What about zoning, does this plan include future expansions?
a. The plan is very focused on systemic historic crash information, not
looking at future development areas where there is no existing
traffic. We did create a High Risk Network (HRN), that includes
roadway characteristics that are at risk of having severe injury
crashes. This will help us better evaluate and communicate about
newer areas of Town in plan review.
2. Do we work with the Developers when they are in the beginning stages of
development?
a. See answer above. Also there is an action item to continually
review and update the Transportation Design Criteria Manual
(TDCM) for Safe System Approach information and recommended
countermeasures determined in the plan. Developers are required
to meet the TDCM criteria as a part of their submittal review and
permitting process.
3. Since this was a grant to create this action plan - would this open other
opportunities for the Town?
a. Yes, by having an adopted Action Plan, the Town is eligible to
pursue FHWA Implementation Grant funding to complete actions or
projects recommended in the Plan. There are also other CDOT
safety and TIP grant opportunities that could be pursued.
4. Moving forward with the Federal Highway Administration - could the Town
go through them for grant money and not through CDOT?
a. Yes, see above, the same FHWA grant program, Safe Streets for
All (SS4A), used for the Action Plan planning process, has an
Implementation grant program also.
5. How does this get implemented if we don’t get any grants, how does the
Town prioritize the projects? And do any of these projects overlap other
projects in the Town?
a. Besides seeking grant funding, we plan to use the Plan to:
·
Explore speed management education, enforcement, and
engineering strategies with Police on four high priority corridors:
Meadows Pkwy, Founders Pkwy, Meadows Blvd, and Plum
Creek Pkwy. The cost of implementation to be determined
based on strategies utilized.
·
Create implementation work plan for low cost, highly effective
signage, marking, and signal modification recommendations at
60 locations. The anticipated cost is $320,000 beyond current
maintenance of these assets. Implementation will be
contingent on annual budget development and weighed against
competing priorities for those funds.
·
Create a 5-year plan for budget and resources to complete high
benefit to cost ratio projects at 54 locations, including: speed
tables, clearing intersection sight lines, vehicle movement
restrictions, additional signal detection technology, revise
pedestrian crossing setbacks, advanced warning beacons, and
curb extensions. The anticipated cost is $1.7M. Implementation
will be contingent on annual budget development and weighed
against competing priorities for those funds.
There is a prioritization table in the Plan that we would follow. High benefit,