Pine Canyon Annexation [535 acres, located on both the east and west
sides of Interstate 25 (I-25). The portion of the property east of I-25 is
generally north of Scott Boulevard, south of Black Feather Trail, west of
Founders Parkway, and east of Front Street]
Mrs. Vargish presented on PC 2025-003 Pine Canyon Annexation and PC
2025-004 Pine Canyon Planned Development Plan and Zoning. Kurt Walker,
landowner and Marcus Pachner, consultant gave a presentation. Commissioner
Samuelson asked about the I25 bypass, the applicant responded. Commissioner
Samuelson also asked about the benefits that staff described with the
development occurring in the Town vs. the County, especially in terms of water.
Staff responded. Chair Warnke asked for clarification on the water being brought
with the project vs. what was reserved. Staff responded. Chair Warnke clarified
the circumstances of groundwater if the project developed in the County, staff
responded. Chair Warnke asked about stormwater and sewer and if the benefits
are similar, staff responded. Commissioner Samuelson asked for the remaining
benefits to development in the Town outside of water, staff responded.
Commissioner Samuelson reiterated that development fees would go towards
Town upgrades, staff responded. Commissioner Stanley asked about the zoning
of the spa and how staff see's that fitting into the surrounding uses. Staff
responded. Commissioner Stanley asked about public vs. community amenities,
the applicant responded. Chair Warnke asked if the Parks Department would be
involved in the open space and parks that are proposed in the project. Staff
responded. Vice Chair McHugh asked for clarification on the accessibility and
transportation throughout the community, staff responded. Chair Warnke asked
about the dedicated school site and if the school district has been included in
conversations, the applicant responded. Chair Warnke asked about the proposed
trail that runs through eh existing homestead area, and if the applicant had any
concerns about its location. The applicant responded. Chair Warnke asked about
the proposal for a FFA partnership and how that ties in, the applicant responded.
Commissioner Stanley asked for clarification on the traffic impacts and
what/where the improvements will be made at various intersections around
Town/what the traffic study identified. The applicant responded. Commissioner
Stanley asked for clarification on the Four Corners intersection that was recently
upgraded, the applicant responded. Commissioner Samuelson asked why the
applicant was not previously able to irrigate their farmland, the applicant and staff
responded. Chair Warnke asked about a potential timeframe, the applicant
responded. Four members of the public spoke about the project, three in favor of
the project being developed in the Town, and one against the project. Major
concerns included traffic, safety and school district support. Chair Warnke asked
for clarification on impact fees and how those are used, staff responded.
Commissioner Samuelson asked about the requirement of traffic studies moving
forward, staff responded. Commissioner Samuelson asked for clarification on the
consideration of the property to the north and any potential development proposed.
Staff responded. Commissioner Stanley asked for clarification on the potential for
the spa and how many units would be built if the spa does not get built, as well as
the concerns of the gas pipelines that were updated on the property by Black Hills
Energy, staff and applicant responded. Staff offered elaboration on the traffic
concerns. Chair Warnke asked for elaboration on conversations with the school
district regarding the future school site that is proposed. The applicant responded.
Staff offered comments on public land and school dedications within new
developments.
Moved by Sawin, seconded by Samuelson, to Approve Planning Commission Topic
PC 2025-003 as presented. The motion passed by a vote of: 6-0.
6 - Samuelson, Martinez, Chair Warnke, Vice Chair McHugh, Olson Stanley, and Sawin
Yes: