To: Honorable Mayor and Members of Town Council
Through: David L. Corliss, Town Manager
Tara Vargish, Director, Development Services
From: Sandy Vossler, Senior Planner, Development Services Department
Title
Resolution Approving Lot 2A & 2B, Block 1, The Meadows Filing No. 11, Parcel 8 and Parcel 9 Site Development Plan (The Learning Experience Daycare) [Located Southwest of Meadows Boulevard and Painthorse Drive]
Body
______________________________________________________________________
PUBLIC HEARING
Resolution Approving Lot 2A & 2B, Block 1, The Meadows Filing No. 11, Parcels 8 & 9 Site Development Plan (The Learning Experience Daycare) [Located Southwest of Meadows Boulevard and Painthorse Drive]
The Town Council will now consider a request for the approval of Resolution Approving Lot 2A & 2B, Block 1, The Meadows Filing No. 11, Parcels 8 & 9 Site Development Plan [Daycare Located Southwest of Meadows Boulevard and Painthorse Drive].
In order to afford all parties due process under law, the Town Council members must be fair and impartial in deciding whether this application should be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. In making that determination, each Councilmember must consider the record, which includes the planning commission recommendation, the staff recommendation, the applicant presentation, public comment presented during the hearing, and other written public comments offered before or during the hearing. Under law, Town Council must evaluate this proposal based solely upon the record and the criteria established under the Municipal Code, which are highlighted in the staff report.
It is important that each Councilmember remain objective and capable of considering information offered into the record during this hearing.
Does any Councilmember believe that he or she is incapable of evaluating and voting on the application consistent with these due process requirements? If so, please describe the situation and recuse yourself from further participation on this agenda item.
Does any Councilmember have a conflict of interest or any other matter he or she would like to disclose prior to proceeding on this item?
The Council will hear from the applicant, the public and staff. Time for this public hearing is allotted as follows:
Staff Report: as needed
Applicant Presentation: as needed
Public Comment: as needed
Applicant Response as needed
Council Questions: as needed
Follow-up Questions: as needed
Madame Clerk, has this public hearing been properly noticed under the applicable regulations for this type of land use hearing? (Clerk to refer to certification from Development Services, describing the notice).
Ms. Vargish, the staff introduction please
(Public hearing is conducted, applicant presentation, public comment, applicant response, questions from Council)
Do any Council members have any final questions of staff or the applicant before I close the public hearing and refer this to the Council for action?
I now close the public hearing and refer this to Council for discussion and action.
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of Town Council
Through: Tara Vargish, Director, Development Services
From: Sandy Vossler, Senior Planner, Development Services Department
Title: Resolution Approving Lot 2A & 2B, Block 1, The Meadows Filing No. 11, Parcels 8 & 9 Site Development Plan [Daycare Located Southwest of Meadows Boulevard and Painthorse Drive]
Executive Summary
On October 22, 2020, the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the Site Development Plan (SDP). No members of the public joined the meeting to address the Commission. Staff received a few email statements in opposition to the proposed use, which are included in this report as Attachment C.
Castle Rock Development Company, on behalf of Aspirant Development, is seeking approval of a Site Development Plan for a property located southwest of the intersection of Meadows Boulevard and Painthorse Drive (Attachment A). The Site Development Plan (SDP) proposes a single story 10,000 square foot (sf) daycare center, an outdoor play area and associated parking, landscaping and infrastructure (Attachment B).
This proposed development is subject to the Residential/Non-Residential Interface Regulations (Interface Regulations) which requires the SDP to be reviewed by Planning Commission and Town Council with respect to mitigation measures on site and within the required buffer area. Public hearings are required before the Planning Commission and Town Council in order to take public testimony and consider the effectiveness of the proposed Interface mitigation measures proposed with the site plan.
Budget Impact
Development of the property will generate review and impact fees, along with use taxes for commercial development. Other ongoing costs of serving the property, in terms of public infrastructure and services, will be comparable to similar developments in Castle Rock.
Findings
All staff review comments and external referral comments have been addressed. Planning Commission found that the proposed Site Development Plan for Meadows Filing No. 11, Parcels 8 and 9, Block 1, Lots 2A and 2B addresses the following:
• Conforms with the objectives of the Town Vision and the Comprehensive Master Plan,
• Meets the requirements of the Meadows Preliminary PD Site Plan and PD Zoning Regulations, Amendment No. 4,
• Meets the review and approval criteria of the Municipal Code, Chapter 17.38 and 17.50, and
• Adequate water, wastewater, storm sewer and road infrastructure exists or is proposed with this project to serve the property.
Recommendation
Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend to Town Council approval of the Site Development Plan, as proposed.
Proposed Motion
I move to approve the Resolution, as introduced by title.
Attachments
Attachment A: Vicinity Map
Attachment B: Resolution
Attachment B: Exhibit 1: Site Development Plan
Attachment C: Resident Emails