Castle Rock Banner
File #: RES 2019-088    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Quasi-Judicial Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 7/30/2019 In control: Town Council
On agenda: 9/3/2019 Final action: 9/3/2019
Title: Resolution Approving the Meadows Filing 16, Parcel 6 Superblock and Parcel 7 Site Development Plan, Amendment No. 10 [Single-Family Detached Homes; North of Wolfensberger Road / Coachline Road Intersection] (Town of Castle Rock Project SDP18-0057)
Attachments: 1. Staff Report, 2. Attachment A: Vicinity Map, 3. Attachment B: Resolution, 4. Attachment B, Exhibit 1: Site Development Plan, 5. Attachment C: Meadows PD Plan, 4th Amendment - Sheet 2 of 5, 6. Attachment D: Meadows Filing No. 16 Preliminary Plat/Final PD Site Plan - Sheet 21 of 87, 7. Attachment E: Planning Commission Minutes of August 22, 2019 - Draft, 8. Staff Presentation, 9. Applicant Presentation

To:                     Honorable Mayor and Members of Town Council

 

Through:                     Bill Detweiler, Director Development Services

 

From:                     Sandy Vossler, Senior Planner, Development Services Department

 

Title
Resolution Approving the Meadows Filing 16, Parcel 6 Superblock and Parcel 7 Site Development Plan, Amendment No. 10
[Single-Family Detached Homes; North of Wolfensberger Road / Coachline Road Intersection] (Town of Castle Rock Project SDP18-0057)

Body

______________________________________________________________________

 

PUBLIC HEARING

 

Resolution Approving the Meadows Filing 16, Parcel 6 Superblock and Parcel 7 Site Development Plan, Amendment No. 10 [Single-Family Detached Homes; North of Wolfensberger Road / Coachline Road Intersection] (Town of Castle Rock Project SDP18-0057)

 

The Town Council will now consider a request for the approval of a Resolution Approving the Meadows Filing 16, Parcel 6 Superblock and Parcel 7 Site Development Plan, Amendment No. 10 [Single-Family Detached Homes; North of Wolfensberger Road / Coachline Road Intersection] (Town of Castle Rock Project SDP18-0057).

 

In order to afford all parties due process under law, the Town Council members must be fair and impartial in deciding whether this application should be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. In making that determination, each Councilmember must consider the record, which includes the planning commission recommendation, the staff recommendation, the applicant presentation, public comment presented during the hearing, and other written public comments offered before or during the hearing. Under law, Town Council must evaluate this proposal based solely upon the record and the criteria established under the Municipal Code, which are highlighted in the staff report.  

 

It is important that each Councilmember remain objective and capable of considering information offered into the record during this hearing. 

 

Does any Councilmember believe that he or she is incapable of evaluating and voting on the application consistent with these due process requirements? If so, please describe the situation and recuse yourself from further participation on this agenda item.

Does any Councilmember have a conflict of interest or any other matter he or she would like to disclose prior to proceeding on this item?

 

The Council will hear from the applicant, the public and staff. Time for this public hearing is allotted as follows:

                     Staff Report:                      as needed

                     Applicant Presentation:                      as needed

                     Public Comment:                      as needed

                     Applicant Response                       as needed

                     Council Questions:                       as needed

                     Follow-up Questions:                      as needed

 

Madame Clerk, has this public hearing been properly noticed under the applicable regulations for this type of land use hearing? (Clerk to refer to certification from Development Services, describing the notice).

 

Mr. Detweiler, the staff introduction please

 

(Public hearing is conducted, applicant presentation, public comment, applicant response, questions from Council)

 

Do any Council members have any final questions of staff or the applicant before I close the public hearing and refer this to the Council for action? 

 

I now close the public hearing and refer this to Council for discussion and action.

 

 

 

 

AGENDA MEMORANDUM

 

 

To:                     Honorable Mayor and Members of Town Council

 

Through:                     Bill Detweiler, Director Development Services

 

From:                     Sandy Vossler, Senior Planner, Development Services Department

 

Title:                     Resolution Approving the Meadows Filing 16, Parcel 6 Superblock and Parcel 7 Site Development Plan, Amendment No. 10 [Single-Family Detached Homes; North of Wolfensberger Road / Coachline Road Intersection] (Town of Castle Rock Project SDP18-0057)

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Planning Commission considered this proposal on August 22, 2019 and voted 5-0 to recommend approval (Attachment D).

 

The Meadows Filing No.16 site plan was approved in 2004 and included Parcels 1 through 8.  This proposed Site Development Plan (SDP) amendment applies to a portion of Parcel 6 and all of Parcel 7, which are located east, and west of Coachline Road at the intersection with Wolfensberger Road.

 

This SDP amendment proposes a new neighborhood of 57 single-family detached dwelling units on 38.6 acres.  Approximately 75% of the total site area will be set aside as open space (Attachment B).  The area of development in Parcel 7 is reduced leaving additional open space undisturbed.

 

The Meadows Planned Development (PD) was approved in 1984 and has gone through several rezonings.  The current PD zoning was approved in 2003.  Per the PD Plan, Parcels 6 and 7 are within Use Area D that allows up to 1,467 dwelling units (Attachment C).  To date, 1,309 units have been constructed in Use Area D.  If this site plan is approved, the total number of dwelling units in Use Area D will be 1,425; still below the maximum permitted under the current zoning.

 

Budget Impact

 

Development of the property will generate review and impact fees, along with use taxes for residential development.  Other ongoing costs of serving a new neighborhood, in terms of public infrastructure and services, the project will be comparable to other residential developments in Castle Rock.

 

Planning Commission Action

 

Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 22, 2019 to consider the proposed Site Development Plan Amendment.  No members of the public addressed the Commission.  The Planning Commission asked general questions about the location of the EVA and maintenance responsibilities for the detention pond.  The Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the SDP amendment, as proposed (Attachment E).

 

Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation

 

Planning Commission found that the proposed site plan amendment

 

                     Supports the objectives of the Town Vision and the Comprehensive Master Plan,

                     Complies with the requirements of the Meadows Preliminary PD Site Plan, Amendment No. 4 and PD Zoning Regulations, and

                     Complies with the review and approval criteria of the Municipal Code, Chapter 17.38 - Site Development Plan Amendment

 

Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend to Town Council approval of the Site Development Plan Amendment, as proposed.

 

Proposed Motion

 

“I move to approve the Resolution, as introduced by title.”

 

Attachments

 

Attachment A:                     Vicinity Map

Attachment B:                     Resolution

Attachment B:                     Exhibit 1 - Site Development Plan

Attachment C:                     Meadows PD Plan, 4th Amendment - Sheet 2 of 5

Attachment D:                     Meadows Filing No. 16 Preliminary Plat/Final PD Site Plan - Sheet 21of 87

Attachment E:                     Planning Commission Minutes of August 22, 2019