To: Honorable Mayor and Members of Town Council
Through: Bill Detweiler, Director, Development Services
From: Donna Ferguson, Senior Planner, Development Services
Title
Resolution Approving the Use By Special Review/Site Development Plan Planning Areas 47, 51 and 52 of the Terrain PD (Upper Sunstone Village USR-SDP18-0032) [located south of State Highway 86, north of Enderud Boulevard and east of N. Ridge Road]
Body
______________________________________________________________________
PUBLIC HEARING
Resolution Approving the Use By Special Review/Site Development Plan Planning Areas 47, 51 and 52 of the Terrain PD (Upper Sunstone Village USR-SDP18-0032)
The Town Council will now consider a request for the approval of Resolution Approving the Use By Special Review/Site Development Plan Planning Areas 47, 51 and 52 of the Terrain PD (Upper Sunstone Village USR-SDP18-0032).
In order to afford all parties due process under law, the Town Council members must be fair and impartial in deciding whether this application should be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. In making that determination, each Councilmember must consider the record, which includes the planning commission recommendation, the staff recommendation, the applicant presentation, public comment presented during the hearing, and other written public comments offered before or during the hearing. Under law, Town Council must evaluate this proposal based solely upon the record and the criteria established under the Municipal Code, which are highlighted in the staff report.
It is important that each Councilmember remain objective and capable of considering information offered into the record during this hearing.
Does any Councilmember believe that he or she is incapable of evaluating and voting on the application consistent with these due process requirements? If so, please describe the situation and recuse yourself from further participation on this agenda item.
Does any Councilmember have a conflict of interest or any other matter he or she would like to disclose prior to proceeding on this item?
The Council will hear from the applicant, the public and staff. Time for this public hearing is allotted as follows:
Staff Report: as needed
Applicant Presentation: as needed
Public Comment: as needed
Applicant Response: as needed
Council Questions: as needed
Follow-up Questions: as needed
Madame Clerk, has this public hearing been properly noticed under the applicable regulations for this type of land use hearing? (Clerk to refer to certification from Development Services, describing the notice).
Mr. Detweiler, the staff introduction please
(Public hearing is conducted, applicant presentation, public comment, applicant response, questions from Council)
Do any Council members have any final questions of staff or the applicant before I close the public hearing and refer this to the Council for action?
I now close the public hearing and refer this to Council for discussion and action.
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of Town Council
Through: Bill Detweiler, Director, Development Services
From: Donna Ferguson, Senior Planner, Development Services
Title: Resolution: Terrain Planning Areas 47, 51 and 52, Use by Special Review/Site Development Plan (Upper Sunstone Village USR-SDP18-0032)
Executive Summary
On January 24, 2019, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the USR-SDP as presented.
SLV Castle Oaks, LLC (Applicant), is proposing a Use by Special Review-Site Development Plan (USR-SDP), known as Upper Sunstone Village, for 261 single-family dwelling units, both detached and attached, on a 56.5 acre parcel. The parcel is located south of State Highway 86, north of Enderud Boulevard and east of N. Ridge Road (Figure 1). USR-SDP applications require public hearing before Town Council who shall review and make a decision upon the proposal after review and recommendation by Planning Commission.
Budget Impact
Development of the property with 261 dwelling units will generate review and impact fees, along with use taxes. Other ongoing costs of serving a new neighborhood, in terms of public infrastructure and amenities, as well as police and fire, will be comparable to other similar single-family residential developments in Castle Rock.
Recommendation
On February 24, 2019, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the Use by Special Review-SDP as presented
Proposed Motion
I move to approve the resolution as introduced by title.
Attachments
Attachment A: Resolution
Exhibit 1: Property
Exhibit 2: Use by Special Review-Site Development Plan
Attachment B: Site Development Plan review and approval criteria
Attachment C: Use by Specials Review review and approval criteria
Attachment D: TIS