To: Honorable Mayor and Members of Town Council
From: Julie Kirkpatrick, RLA, ASLA, Planner II, Development Services
Title
Resolution: Approving the Site Development Plan for the Proposed The Meadows Filing No. 17, Area 4, Amendment No. 10, Lot 6E [Vet Clinic north of Prairie Hawk Drive and Fence Post Drive]
Body
______________________________________________________________________
PUBLIC HEARING
A Resolution Approving the Site Development Plan for the Proposed The Meadows
Filing No. 17, Area 4, Amendment No. 10, Lot 6E
The Town Council will now consider a request for the approval of A Resolution Approving the Site Development Plan for the Proposed The Meadows Filing No. 17, Area 4, Amendment No. 10, Lot 6E.
In order to afford all parties due process under law, the Town Council members must be fair and impartial in deciding whether this application should be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. In making that determination, each Councilmember must consider the record, which includes the planning commission recommendation, the staff recommendation, the applicant presentation, public comment presented during the hearing, and other written public comments offered before or during the hearing. Under law, Town Council must evaluate this proposal based solely upon the record and the criteria established under the Municipal Code, which are highlighted in the staff report.
It is important that each Councilmember remain objective and capable of considering information offered into the record during this hearing.
Does any Councilmember believe that he or she is incapable of evaluating and voting on the application consistent with these due process requirements? If so, please describe the situation and recuse yourself from further participation on this agenda item.
Does any Councilmember have a conflict of interest or any other matter he or she would like to disclose prior to proceeding on this item?
The Council will hear from the applicant, the public and staff. Time for this public hearing is allotted as follows:
Staff Report: as needed
Applicant Presentation: as needed
Public Comment: as needed
Applicant Response as needed
Council Questions: as needed
Follow-up Questions: as needed
Madame Clerk, has this public hearing been properly noticed under the applicable regulations for this type of land use hearing? (Clerk to refer to certification from Development Services, describing the notice).
Mr. Detweiler, the staff introduction please
(Public hearing is conducted, applicant presentation, public comment, applicant response, questions from Council)
Do any Council members have any final questions of staff or the applicant before I close the public hearing and refer this to the Council for action?
I now close the public hearing and refer this to Council for discussion and action.
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of Town Council
From: Julie Kirkpatrick, PLA, ASLA, Planner II, Development Services
Title: Resolution: Approving the Site Development Plan for the Proposed The Meadows Filing No. 17, Area 4, Amendment No. 10, Lot 6E [Vet Clinic north of Prairie Hawk Drive and Fence Post Drive]
Executive Summary
NOTE: Please refer to the staff report for graphics and photos.
Since opening in 2006, the existing Brooklyn Veterinary Clinic on N. Industrial Way has outgrown their current location and is looking to relocate to the Meadows. Dr. Deb Patterson and her vet team would like to build a new 8,247 square foot general practice animal hospital in the vicinity of Prairie Hawk and Fence Post Drive, on the north side of Prairie Hawk Drive. Virtuoso Drive will be extended from Dacoro to Prairie Hawk, and the clinic will access the new section of Virtuoso Drive. The new, locally owned and operated facility will include seven exam rooms, treatment center, surgery suite, dental facility, and a boarding/pet daycare facility. This clinic will provide a needed veterinary service to our community, particularly to the Meadows and surrounding neighborhoods. Because the site is located across the street from existing homes, the Residential/Nonresidential Interface Regulations apply and require public hearings for approval. At their January 28th hearing, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval with no public comments.
Budget Impact
The proposed SPD Plan will generate review and impact fees, along with taxes.
Recommendation
Based on the analysis and findings outlined in this report, Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed SDP.
Proposed Motion
I move to approve the Site Development Plan for the proposed The Meadows Filing No. 17, Area 4, Amendment No. 10, Lot 6E.
Attachments
Attachment A: Resolution
Exhibit 1: Site Development Plan
Attachment B: Community Comments
Attachment C: Planning Commission Minutes